Despite breaching the Fair Trading Act for misleading a buyer, real estate agent Tim Whitehead left the High Court without a conviction and remains a licenced agent.
In 2004 Mr Whitehead advertised a Wellington property as seeking enquiries above $380,000 though the vendor wouldn’t consider less than $400,000.
After a lengthy court process in 2007 Mr Whitehead was fined $7500 in the Hastings District Court for three charges of breaching the Fair Trading Act on misleading use of a ‘buyer enquiry over’ price.
When The Real Estate Agents Act 2008 came in to force detailing that any agents with a conviction can’t hold a licence for five years, Mr Whitehead appealed his conviction to dodge being banned from his industry for that length of time.
Justice Rhys Harrison said the consequence of a five year lockout from selling houses was out of all proportion to the gravity of the offending, and discharged Mr Whitehead without any conviction on all three offences.
“However, the judgment concludes with a stern warning from Justice Harrison to the real estate industry that contraventions of the Fair Trading Act now carry a serious consequence,” the Commerce Commission said.
Justice Harrison said the purpose and policy of the Real Estate Agents Authority was unequivocal.
“It is a legislative response to public concern about the unacceptable practices of a small but damaging minority in the real estate profession. It is designed to have a remedial effect by proscribing certain conduct and, in particular, to exclude from the profession’s ranks those who are convicted on contravening the FTA. The message is now unmistakeable.”
Commerce Commission fair trading manager Greg Allan said the financial consequences to Mr Whitehead on being banned for five years would be from conduct that happened “well before the Real Estate Agents Act was envisaged or enacted”.
Mr Whitehead remains a full time real estate agent holding a current active salesperson licence that expires at the end of this month.
Comments and questions7
Perfect person for politics, get away with bending the rules, even the rules they make, the perfect next prime minister.
I agree with you Alan. It's a bit like the name suppression thing for those who know the right people, isn't it ? These "big noters " who offend should consider the conseqiences BEFORE offending--NOT complain about them afterwards. Perhaps everyone should remember the name--MR TIM WHITEHEAD
His blurb is still online at his personal website (I'm guessing more people will read this than remember a name from an obscure high court ruling: "Tim Whitehead is a rare find in the competitive world of real estate. Well regarded within the industry for the high levels of professionalism and integrity he brings to the sales process"
Once up on a time these people would find houses for people, or people for houses. Now all they do is sell "marketing packages", without being able to even search a tile or know the difference between "Limited to Parcels", or Cross Lease. Shame on you parasites !!
Sounds to me the seller wanted more for the house than it was worth ,,,Mr Whitehead told them the truth and got punished,the seller should have been charged with misleading actions .WHEN DOES THE FAIR TRADING ACT WORK BOTH WAYS.T he judge made the right call good for him,there are too many mealy mouthed sellers bleating over things that are completely out of left field.
Thank heavens for the sensible Judge, this is another example of a so called offence being blown out of all proportion while the likes of Hotchins and Watson go scott free!!
Unfortunately for Tim the unjustified publicity will affect his business even though he is a good guy.
Checkout the Nelson Property Weekly sometime and pick and agent to prosecute.
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below