Visit the full NBR website
HomeTechnology  

NZ IT services market posts highest growth since GFC; shake-up of top vendor rankings

The local IT services market grew 4.4% year-on-year  for the first six months of 2012, to $1.7 billion, according to IDC New Zealand's latest IT Services Tracker,

This was the largest growth the market has experienced since the first half of 2008, prior to the global financial crisis. 

Until 2016, the revenue growth is expected to even at a five-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.0%, driven by strong growth in outsourced services particularly hosting services and network management. 

The outsourcing market remained the largest in terms of revenues across the IT services foundation growing by 5.1% year-on-year, and was the biggest area of IT spending growth in 1H 2012. Strong growth is still being experienced in hosted services with a significant number of organisations outsourcing datacenter services and harnessing the potential of cloud services.

“Hosting services remain in high demand as both the market understanding and available solution portfolios are maturing. This is shifting the conversation from initial infrastructure discussions to applications and specific business processes and workloads, says Louise Francis, Snr Analyst at IDC New Zealand.

In terms of IT Service providers, the market share of the top 10 vendors remained unchanged from last year, accounting for 44.6% of the total IT services market.

This reflects the stability of the upper end of the market in terms of competition. However, there was a reshuffle of market shares of the top five competitors in the first six months of 2012.

While Telecom's IT and telco services division, Gen-i, remains at the top with a market share of 13.9%, Datacom has leapfrogged HP, achieving a 10.3% market share and second place.

This comes on the back of high revenue growth in IT outsourcing and Datacom’s selection as one of three preferred vendors for the government's infrastructure as a service (IaaS) work and its successful leverage of cross Tasman relationships and resources.

IT Servicer provider market share, first half 2012
1.Gen-i 13.8%
2. Datacom 10.2%
3. Hewlett-Packard 10.0%
4 IBM 7.4%
5 Dimension Data 3.2%
Source: IDC New Zealand IT Services Tracker, 1H 2012

"These results demonstrate how dynamic the market is in terms of customer churn and  reinforces the need for service providers to be vigilant in maintaining their branding and staying close to their customers," says Louise Francis, senior market analyst, IDC New Zealand.

"Even large entrenched service providers are not immune to customer churn. Satisfaction is no longer a determinant of loyalty – instead the focus is on added value above and beyond contracted service level agreements."

IDC's semi-annual IT Services Tracker details the revenues per service provider and provides a forecast update every six months, with the most recent tracker covering the six months ending June 2012.   The tracker provides a detailed analysis of the IT services by market sub-segments as well as providing historical information to shed light on the changing market dynamics and who is best positioned in the market. 
 

More by this author

Comments and questions

I disagree with one of the comments. Satisfaction is absolutely a determinant of loyalty, there are just many unsatisfied customers out there.

All of these companies rightly deserve to be here in the top 5. Some customer churn between projects is understandable at this level.

They are the Tier One providers, along with a few others.

****It would be very helpful to see are top fives for different tiers or spend bands, say projects <100,000, <1m, <5m, etc.****

It is so common for us Kiwi companies to suffer through disastrous IT projects simply because we engage the wrong vendor.

It is hard to determine if a vendor is is reputable.

My company is suffering badly right now because of the silly mistake of giving a multi-million dollar system upgrade project to a less than useless provider, and it is not the first time they burned us!

Coming up on two years and nothing useful delivered. We are to blame for keeping this going - throwing good money after bad - and I expect some my management team will get booted out.

At the time I thought it odd that all their reference projects were older and from one-off clients - they were not engaged again by these clients!

CFO's beware. Cheap and offshore-driven projects will cost you huge in the long run. Ddo your due diligence look for long-term REPEAT business from companies and real references.

I agree with the above comments. It's all down to what competency the supplier has - or more importantly their staff's competancy - and if their staff are experienced.

Something often left out by companies when reviewing suppliers is an examination of their company culture and stability. I know of a place in Wellington that lost half its developers this year. You have to question such things, especially if it happens during your project timelines. Every time I walked in it was different staff.

Their are some fantastic small operators. -I'm talking one to 10 person specialist companies - out there that can work wonders. Sometimes these smaller players get traction quicker and give you undivided attention.
My 2 cents.

As to company rankings, are you comparing applies to apples or is there an orange in the mix? Take a closer look at Gen-i and you will find much of the revenue is comprised of telco business i.e. not true IT services. Gen-i leverages Telcom's network data services then counts these as their own. If you excluse that component Gen-i would not be on the list. Why not take a closer look then re-publish the rankings as a true IT services apples to apples comparison.

« Back to home page