HomeBusiness  

Farming innovation idea to cost millions to be heard

An anti-business “innovation tax” has forced the companies behind plans to develop indoor dairy farms in South Canterbury’s MacKenzie basin to dump its idea – for now.

Southdown Holdings, Williamson Holdings and Five Rivers lodged resource consent applications for effluent with Environment Canterbury (Ecan) last year.

The companies wanted to house up to18,000 cows in cubical stables 24 hours a day for eight months of the year, spanning winter, and 12 hours a day for four months during summer.

Jointly, the group has already spent $1.8 million and this week wad advised by the Ministry for the Environment that it would have to pay a further $2.6 million – costs associated with the “call in” sparked by Environment Minister Nick Smith earlier this year.

The call in was due to the scale of the discharge consents, the fragile nature of the MacKenzie basin and the importance of freshwater quality to the government and the high level of public interest.

The applications would usually have been dealt with by Ecan. The call in means a special board of inquiry would be created, if the companies fronted up with the cash to fund it.

Of the 5200 submissions the consent applications attracted, most referred to animal welfare issues, which the RMA process does not consider.

Southdown Holdings and Williamson Holdings director Richard Peacocke told NBR said the costs were “crazy.”

However, the three companies still have applications for water in along with about 30 other farmers in the region and will forge ahead with those.

If consent to take water is granted, traditional dairy farm models would be created.

“This means we won’t get the productivity we were looking for,” he said.

But, Mr Peacocke said the government was standing in the way of progress and stymied the ability to grow the economy.

He said the cubical stable system, used in the United States and in Europe, meant less feed was required for the stock and production per cow increased.

“How does the country achieve growth if the government flip flops trying to placate everybody,” Mr Peacocke said.

Federated Farmers president Don Nicolson told NBR said the decision to charge the applicants for the MacKenzie country project was a “king hit,”

Mr Nicolson said Dr Smith was affected by the rhetoric in the media about the project.

“It shouldn’t be that hard that people can’t get through due process,” he said.

Dr Smith had said the estimated turnover of the proposed farms was $30 million and the cost of calling in the applications needed to be viewed in the context of that turnover.

While Mr Peacocke said the potential turnover was probably closer to $60 million, the costs imposed by the ministry were cost prohibitive.

More by Liam Baldwin

Comments and questions
2

South America is full of development friendly countries!!
China !
Vietnam!

New Zealand is run by a self destructive minority that are working every day to brain wash the majority that We humans are the evil of the earth and should sacrifice ourselves and our intellect to De Development..

They have no rear vision of how Man has adapted to be more and more smart and able to cohabitate with the environment intelligently and only look to a short blip in history that was inevitable, that we would pollute before we realised what a problem that was and understood the balance of the earth.

So They Cut OFF THE FUTURE!

D Generation have done more to damage their Children and the future than the polluting generation of discovery before it.

We now have a chance to manage pollution like never before with controlled flows of waste even Methane Collection is possible!
Green house gasses that can't be controlled in the traditional high environmental impact High land use farming model.

We could reduce the land use in New Zealand vastly and reforest if our production methods were not so out of control and wasteful.

No more river/waterways pollution problems..!!

But We are Dirty Green NZ with rivers flowing with Cow Turd and less forest / wild land than nations with far higher populations and less production for that land area!
Far less Far Far Far less...That is not Green.

But if it were all admitted we would find most of the energy for this anti progress jihad is vegeterianism...Undeclared of course because they realise how rediculous the campaign would look in NZ at the moment.
Advance South America, China Vietnam.

D Generate New Zealand! Children of D Generation; the Hippie Nation responsible for the GDP less Mess that NZ has de graded into.

Avatar got $45m of our money to generate an alleged $300m for the economy and has been lauded from the PM down. Hollywood said no pin money no movie (isn't that extortion?).

These Kiwis down south have so far spent $1.6m of their money on the ecology, science and environmental management to serve up what Govt has demanded from dairy in terms of runoff management and carbon neutrality. Having been around dairy cattle, if they're stressed or illtreated they drop production or dry up. There isn't any animal welfare issues as these systems are working here in NZ right now delivering almost 30% more production.

But why on earth did the farmers call it cubicles? These aren't sow stalls and in Europe and the US they're called it loose housing. That was plain dumb as it conjurres up images of sow crates and put them way on the backfoot.

What really gets my goat is that our New Labour Govt is now demanding they spend over $3m including $2.6m upfront to run the Inquiry!

I thought the RMA was meant to be quasi-judicial but the Govt is now saying our quasi-judicial processes are user pays? Geez that's a major policy shift that seems to have escaped media attention.

Worse, it tells overseas investors to keep clear of our neo-socialist enclave due to this precedent setting innovation tax called a 'Call-In'. On top of this, we only country on earth with an all gasses-all sectors ETS so its non wonder, the Wall Street Journal looks at us as a basket case to be poked fun of.

Yet if the Govt did spend $2.6m of my taxes on an Inquiry, I wouldn't complain about that since Govt and Mr Smith Called-In the application in the first place.

But returning to Avatar's 'payback' , this scheme down south has an economic payback almost twice that for the heavily lauded movie. Except it will be year-in, year-out whereas Avatar was a one-hit wonder that opens NZ up for Hollywood extortion.

And they wonder why Kiwis want to join Australia!

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>
« Back to home page